the1920sinpictures:
“1928 Callot Soeurs created this unique evening dress. It has been carefully devised to appear as though it was simply a long silk scarf that has been draped about the frame. In reality the black silk crepe chiffon of the dress...
the1920sinpictures

1928 Callot Soeurs created this unique evening dress. It has been carefully devised to appear as though it was simply a long silk scarf that has been draped about the frame. In reality the black silk crepe chiffon of the dress has been expertly embroidered in a manner that enhances that illusion. There is a narrow band of black silk panne velvet that borders the chiffon and gives it a bit more structure. The dress also has a silk satin underdress that exists primarily as a support structure. From Attire’s Mind, FB.

aquaristlifeforme

Baxter, telling you all about it.

gremlinbehaviour

Video description: A close-up video of an otter in a large basket who opens it’s mouth and makes a croaking squeaking sound and leaves its mouth open for a few seconds as it seems to yawn, showing off the inside of it’s mouth, before closing it again. End description.

aurpiment

Dreamed that there was a mundane-setting TTRPG I’m going to call “Greg and Maureen” where the players are visiting a non-player character couple their characters are friends with. But the couple is going through a rough spot! The objective was to investigate their relationship and either to help their marriage or hasten their divorce. It’s always small town and you’re always staying at their house. Players could add a little flavor of how they knew Greg and Maureen and even choose some minor traits for them before the game.

I’d played the game with another group before, but I didn’t know there were multiple paths. There’s a note Greg writes confessing to something, but depending on the dice roll it’s a different note. The content of a major plot point depended on a 2d6 dice roll.

In the dream, I’d previously played a version where he confessed to cheating on Maureen with another woman, so I thought Maureen should see the note, but in the game we were playing, my friend Celia found the note, which actually said that Greg was dishonorably discharged from the army for a gay relationship (he’s bisexual) before he met Maureen, and that he had lied about having had an honorable discharge. So for a while I came off as an asshole because I kept saying that Maureen needed to know the contents of the note so that she could confront him about what he did to her, and my friend seemed to me to be unusually blasé about what I thought was an affair.

There were other possible notes. In other timelines he had never had an affair, never been in the army, never even loved her, etc. There was another possible note where you learned he’d lied to her that he was good at track in high school (imagine an impressive mile time, which my dream mind supplied as 6:40, though that won’t even get you into varsity level) when he was actually bad at track in high school (14 minute mile). This was a lie he’d told, like, once, and he and Maureen almost never talked about running or high school sports.

In every possible timeline, Greg was Utterly Wracked with guilt about his secret. Yes, even the high school track universe.

Also, if players had decided that Greg was white before the game, you could unlock a timeline where his secret was that his distant ancestors had been in league with THE Devil from Christianity between like 1830s and 1910s. (The devil was just their accountant. He was ashamed of them for non-devil reasons.) In this timeline, you could actually meet the devil.

You didn’t find a note in every timeline, so sometimes you had to work off other evidence. I had only ever played mainly investigating Greg, but you could also focus on investigating Maureen. I think the other players and I just suspected him of hiding something every time, due to our biases. Sorry Greg! Guess we weren’t real gregheads.

aurpiment

Who want to play Greg and Maureen with me

Anonymous asked

Google Ambient Chaos if you ever need background noises for writing! It's a customizable soundscape website.

blind-the-winds replied

Anon, when I first saw this ask, I thought it was going to be one of those mixers of nice, traditional sounds, like rain or a coffeeshop. And it is! And there’s lofi hiphop, my favorite sound to write to! Which means this is legitimately an excellent tool for writers, and I love you for introducing it to me.

But I also want to say. There are some choices here. That I need to point out. Because they’re either fantastic or questionable, and I can’t decide.

Things like …

Couple arguing.

A pale purple volume slider in the shape of an arc, on a dark purple background. The slider is set to 0, and in the center, there are two stick figures clearly engaged in a verbal fight. Beneath the slider, it's labeled with "couple arguing," as noted above.ALT

Medieval battle.

The same slider above, except the center figure is a pair of swords crossed.ALT

Beehive, where you can write to a fuckton of bees.

The same slider as above, but the center is a bee.ALT

Crime scene.

The same slider as above, but the center is crossed caution tape.ALT

And actually the perfect soundscape for NaNoWriMo.

Same slider as above, except the center is a radiation symbol. This one is actually labeled "nuclear siren."ALT

(It’s here, for those curious.)

blind-the-winds

Somebody found this last week and reminded me it existed, so I'mma bring it back to this blog because it's about ten days until some of you will need that last one. :D

bunjywunjy

image

I'm never using any other noise generator ever again.

Anonymous asked

As a Taylor Swift expert, Gaylor hater, and recovering 1989er, you probably don't want to know that apparently in the notes of the re-recording Taylor Swift talks about how she wasn't dating any of her female friends, and the Gaylors are having meltdowns on twitter. Words like "gaslit" and "queerbaiting" are being used.

of COURSE I want to know about that, I need to go log back into my twitter account RIGHT NOW

also goddddd as a certified 1989 enjoyer I’m gonna have to listen to Taylor’s Version :/

batmanisagatewaydrug

oh damn the girlies are NOT taking this well

image
batmanisagatewaydrug

sorry I'm so sorry this is the funniest thing that has EVER happened

image
batmanisagatewaydrug

our homegrown tumblr gaylors are also going through it btw

image
vaspider

Holy fuck.

rosslynpaladin

People literally getting ANGRY AT HER for daring to mention she's STRAIGHT. It's personally offending her marginalized fans for her to not go along with their desperation for HER to be Queer.

... Me, I'm a P!nk fan, I have no idea what this is about. Delighted not to be Le Involved here.

derinthescarletpescatarian

image

You left the best part in the tags!

gpedia

Wow what a coincidence @booksandfiltercoffee was just telling me about gaylor panic in the streets of social media.

booksandfiltercoffee

That was brought upon by this post

wizardshark

I especially love that Tumblr screenshot saying "if what you're implying is the truth, just SAY IT" because she has! She's stated over and over again "I am not gay, I am straight, I am heterosexual" and they REFUSED to believe her and blamed it on compulsory heterosexuality, or her being too scared to come out. She LITERALLY did just say it!

bemusedlybespectacled

y'all. y'all. I cracked the fucking code and I am so fucking mad about it because it's a fix that solves every major problem with the finale:

have ed get shot (injured, not killed) in defense of izzy.

seriously, hear me out, this solves LITERALLY EVERY PROBLEM:

  • "Ed never gave Izzy a real apology!" "Izzy would never accept one!" okay, then don't have Ed apologize to Izzy verbally. have him apologize by taking a bullet for him. have Izzy cuss out Ed for doing something so stupid while cradling him in his arms.
  • "Ed never gave the crew a real apology!" okay, then have him get shot defending Izzy as both a subtle callback to Izzy shooting Ed in defense of the crew in "red flags" and as proof that he's changed.
  • "it makes no sense for Izzy to say the whole crew loves Ed when that hasn't been shown at all!" okay, then show it. any lingering hatred the crew has gets wiped out when they see that Ed really does care about Izzy (keeping in mind that him not treating Izzy well was a major unifying thing for them), and they all work to help him: getting the bullet out, holding his hand, telling him he's going to be okay. Ed's accepted back into the family because of his deeds, not his words, and we get a nice call back to the scene where the crew makes Izzy's leg.
  • "Izzy's death was all about Ed and Ed's arc and that's fucked up" okay, so have there be a REASON that Ed is the center of attention (the reason being that he's been shot and the entire crew needs to care for him) and make it actually part of Ed's arc (acting selflessly in defense of them when he's been pretty self-centered and not really accepting responsibility this entire time).
  • "it makes no sense for Ed to retire to an inn on land when we just established that he's bad at things that aren't piracy!" okay, then don't have him retire voluntarily. he needs to recover from his bullet wound on land, and so the crew needs to reluctantly leave him behind.
  • "it makes no sense for Stede to retire to an inn when his entire arc has been him finding a family in the crew and getting the respect he never had!" okay, so make it a really difficult decision for him – staying on land with Ed, the love of his life, or staying with the crew and being a big bad pirate – and ultimately choose Ed. have Ed even try to talk him into staying with the crew, because he loves piracy so much! but given another choice to leave Ed (one that Ed would be aware of and understand), he stays this time.
  • "Izzy's death is inconsistent with the rest of the series where the good guys survive absurd levels of violence and the bad guys die hilarious karmic deaths" okay, so don't have him OR Ed die. have Ed get shot, have him be seriously injured, maybe even fake us out by having him get shot on the right side (which is of course the side with the important bits!), and then have him live.
  • "Izzy dies right when he was starting to enjoy life and find his own family/community outside of Ed!" exactly. so don't kill him. shoot Ed. and then have Ed retire on land.
queermaddscientist

Get yourself a fabric store that will light your fabric on fire for you

No but legit I asked what the fiber content of something was and the guy didn’t know so he cut a chunk off and lit it on fire and felt the ashes and was like. Yeah this is mostly cotton with a lil bit of silk. And that was the moment I knew. This is it. This is the fabric store for me. Also that guy is marriage material. Not for me but damn some person is gonna be so happy with him.

rawringthroughthetwenties

Ok but this is actually one of the easiest ways to tell what something is made of! I did a textiles degree and one day as part of a class we all went outside with a pile of scrap fabric and set fire to the little pieces and recorded how they burned. We were given a chart that looked something like this to tell what each fabric was (it gets a little tricky is it’s a mix of fabrics though). Why did we do this? There is very little regulation in the textiles industry so a lot of materials are mislabelled as something they aren’t and sold for more than they should be, also sometimes people buy fabric second hand or discounted which doesn’t have any label at all. If you have a fabric you are having doubts about, cut a tiny piece off and do the burn test and you should know pretty fast what you are dealing with. Anyways your fabric store should be lighting things on fire because this means that they are actually checking what the fabrics are and aren’t trying to pass cheap stuff off as more expensive than it is.

image
queermaddscientist

Ooh! I knew it was a standard test but I hadn’t seen a chart as detailed as this thank you!

birdrhetorics

This also works on yarn!!!

staffs-secret-blog

Guys. I do not think he was joking when he said this

bemusedlybespectacled

unsure why human pet guy seems to be the most worried about drive-by shootings when he is far more likely to die in a sword fight defending his shitty Pathfinder meta

bemusedlybespectacled

#it’s not even anything specific it’s just #I will be half-way through reading a post on the PF subreddit going #Man this is so long and tedious and overthought why is it still going on hey wait a minute #and scroll back up and there he is (via @zrayak)

@parasite-core since you asked for context (I literally only know this from zrayak being on r/Pathfinder_RPG all the time).

I should add that apparently all of his metas are specifically about certain Pathfinder mechanics that people complain about/don’t like and are basically “well ACTUALLY they’re GREAT if you just THINK about them in the exact same absurd way that I do, let me spend five hours explaining why” and the replies tend to be either “okay yeah that works for this one specific minor scenario but you’re getting way too granular about it” or just “oh hey, it’s human pet guy!”

ramblingruminations

Ed being shit at fishing was hilarious but what if he was not?

What we see is that he didn’t fail because he couldn’t do it but just because he was lost in his own head and didnt even try. It makes a mockery of what we are meant to consider one of his primary character motivations since season 1. Ed wants a different life but apparently not enough to put any effort into it?

Having Ed genuinely try to build a life, irrespective of how good or bad he was at it would have been so good at raising the stakes for him returning to his leathers. It would also have made the ending much more satisfactory too. Instead he brushes it off as him being a dick. (Ok yes, he was a dick but so was Stede. I wish the show would acknowledge that more often). Also! You are no good at anything other than being a pirate was a pointless angle to insert at that point with no intention of addressing it any further.
Even if they wanted to keep the possibility of further conflict they already have every thing they need because nothing was actually resolved this season. Ed and Stede still want different things.
And failing at life on land has so much lower states than actually succeeding and still not finding the peace/satisfaction because that is not who they are. It is not what Stede wanted.

treesofgreen

The only reason I'm not as upset about what they did to Ed's journey as I am about what they did to Izzy's is that Ed is still alive. They butchered both my boys. I still love both characters and will continue to love them in my heart and fanworks. But good god did canon drop the ball.

bemusedlybespectacled

I still can’t figure out the POINT of that whole thing. like. genuinely I cannot understand what they were trying to do. because Ed’s arc so far is just:

  1. Ed is bored with piracy and wants to try something else.
  2. He tries a number of things other than piracy: being an aristocrat, being in the navy, being a singer/songwriter. None of these things are things he’s actually suited for or are stable.
  3. Izzy confronts him and is like “you can’t try anything else, you need to be Blackbeard,” and Ed goes, “Okay” and goes full Kraken.
  4. Ed is full Kraken but he is even worse than before: cruel, indiscriminately violent, and actively suicidal but in a homicidal way. This is not stable, either.
  5. Ed’s coma dream includes him trying and failing to roleplay as an innkeeper: he doesn’t have the ability to handle even simple conflicts, so clearly that’s not for him, either.
  6. Ed tries to do other activities than piracy, like fishing or repairing the ship, and finds that he enjoys them. He wants to try living his life in a calmer, simpler way, and just be himself, so he dumps his leathers overboard. Izzy agrees with him and suggests he try it (having learned from S1). But that clashes with Stede just starting to become good at piracy, and they argue, and Ed leaves.
  7. Except actually he sucks at fishing also?? And the fishermen that he’s with explicitly tell him to do something he’s actually good at, which is immediately followed by him retrieving his leathers and returning to piracy (i.e. killing navy guys). So obviously he must have just accepted that piracy is what he should do.
  8. Except actually he still wants to leave piracy?? And Izzy’s encouraging him to do that with literally his last dying breaths??? So he decides to go on land and start an inn (a thing we JUST SAW he sucks at) with Stede, who is cool with giving up piracy now even though they fought about it like a day ago, I guess????

The cold open with Ed being terrible at fishing and being told to do what he’s actually good at just… completely fucking clashes with everything in his arc. Is “just Ed” a pirate (something he’s good at but hates) or a normal guy (something he enjoys but sucks at)? Because you’re telling me that he should be a normal guy but then showing me that he just doesn’t have the skills or temperament to pull it off.

Like, what’s the point of having Ed try a new thing and then be bad at it and decide that he should actually be a pirate, only to backtrack at the last minute? WHY WASTE PRECIOUS TIME ON SOMETHING THAT IS NARRATIVELY INCOHERENT AND UNDERMINES HIS ENTIRE ARC?

miniaturize

you know other people have probably articulated this better than i can, but honestly, on some level, transphobes don't actually see gender as something that is biological and innate, and they do have a concept of people who are outside of the gender binary - they just don't see that as a valid identity, but as a punishment. in their eyes, you can fail at being a man or a woman, and you can fail so badly that you are not seen as any gender at all, but you are not allowed to claim this as an actual identity, you are not allowed to intentionally express yourself that way, you are not allowed to enjoy it. gender is something that is given to you and taken from you, and you're not supposed to have any choice in the matter. your options are supposed to be to conform, or to be dehumanized. they don't want you to be able to choose anything else.

corporationsarepeople

I think this nails it.

astercrash

It's the same way voluntarily childless women are derided. Childlessness is a punishment from God, so anyone who voluntarily chooses not to have children devalues the punishment, which in turn strips the reward of avoiding that punishment. If childlessness isn't a curse then your five kids aren't a blessing.

Similarly if someone is happy being anything other than the epitome of their assigned gender then what benefit was there in submitting so completely to that gender themselves?

threeoftwelve

Everyone talks about Klingon Therapist but no one talks about Borg Therapist.

quasi-normalcy

There's something about imagining a vast machine intelligence dispassionately sifting through your memories, seeing all of your cringiest and most traumatic moments, and systematically judging them to be "Irrelevant" that's so horrifying that it flips right around the scale and becomes profoundly comforting.

Like, oh, you're ruminating on that embarrassing thing that you said at a party when you were eight years old? Well, the Borg have assimilated billions of people, and they all have memories like that. You're not unique. They've also assimilated everyone who was at that party and none of them even remember that you were there. Shame is irrelevant. Rumination is irrelevant. Anxiety is irrelevant. You must comply.