



How come nobody ever talks about the people who come out as gay (or lesbian) before they realize they’re bi?
Stephen Colbert salutes UVA’s Class of 2013 Followed by this.
Not Iambic….Do Not...
(via stupiduglyfatcunt)
The best significant others are the ones who talk with you about feminism after a few rounds of kinky sex. Butt bruises + “MRAs are such ignorant asses” = best date night ever.
—BB
In La Femme à Paris the author Octave Uzanne dubbed a woman’s clothing ‘her offensive armour’ - but, in reality, fashion seldom offers protection from the violence of the modern world. The clothing adopted when a woman is at her most vulnerable to attack - the heels, furs and jewels of evening attire - actively works against the idea of self-preservation.
Nick Knight sought to challenge this: born from a desire to protect his own two teenage daughters and inspired by the ‘Slutwalk’ movement of women reclaiming the right to dress as they wish without being seen to invite attack, Knight decided to address the notion of self-defence through a fashion shoot. For this, he chose to collaborate with two much-celebrated and empowered female fashion figures - model Lara Stone, and stylist Carine Roitfeld - to redefine the notion of ‘Power Dressing’ for the twenty-first century.
Specially trained for this shoot in the techniques of Krav Maga, a self-defence system developed by the Israeli Defence Forces, Stone defends herself in a series of scenarios whilst modelling a selection of Spring/Summer 2012’s finest fashions, selected by Roitfeld and captured by Knight in stills for V magazine and on fashion film for SHOWstudio. These films serve two functions - showcasing next season’s key styles, and offering instruction to women, a high-fashion ‘how to’ of self-defence.
Pushing the boundaries of fashion editorial beyond aesthetic, and countering the ‘Brutal Chic’ of violent fashion imagery that dominated in the seventies, Knight, Roitfeld and Stone offer a true vision of ‘Power Dressing’ for a modern and truly powerful woman.Krav Maga - Knife Threat to Body: Prada - Lara Stone and Nick Knight.
(via ilikechampagne)
Here are some awesome and empowering quotes from several very strong female celebrities.
And Kristen Stewart.
No, you know what? Fuck you.
Let me tell you about Kristen Stewart.
Let’s talk about how she’s the centerpiece of one of the most inexplicably popular misogynistic pieces of film shit and somehow gets blamed for it sucking, despite the fact that, hey, the books were actually worse. For those who were lucky enough to escape reading the actual books, her apparent lack of emotion is 100% accurate to Bella’s character, because Bella is in fact not a character but a blank white wall for fourteen-year-old girls to project themselves onto. Robert Pattinson is not the only one in the cast who hates Twilight, thank you.
Let’s talk about how she got crucified in the media for having an affair with a married man, when that man was her director. And let’s remember that she was called all manner of things for “ruining her relationship with RPattz” when she wasn’t even engaged to the dude, let alone married with kids. But oh no, she gets called a slut because she’s Kristen Stewart, she gets her career fucked because she’s Kristen Stewart, and the dude gets off scott free.
Let’s talk about how she is incredibly shy and anxious (rather, incidentally, like Chris Evans) but does film anyway, because she’s just that awesome.
Fuck your noise. She’s not the best actor in the world but she sure as hell doesn’t deserve that kind of shit.
(via wowieowl)
I remember posting somewhere once in a thread about why girls aren’t exploited in animation anymore where some guy said, “all the disney girls are drawn to be generally attractive, but I don’t think there are any eye-candy men… or are there? Are there any Disney men that lots of girls like?” and I mentioned Roger. Tons of girls replied agreeing with me and the original guy was like “wait, Roger? from 101 Dalmatians? What’s attractive about him, he’s tall and lanky and has a big nose, he isn’t muscley at all! Wouldn’t you all prefer Gaston or something? Or do you girls think his big nose is indicative of something else?” and I was like “no, you idiot, he’s a silly, goofy guy who likes animals and can play a bunch of instruments, that’s why he’s attractive. What’s the matter with you? Gaston, seriously?”
This is why we need more girls in animation. And more guys like Roger apparently.
This is why I laugh my ass of whenever dudes talk about how men are “objectified” by the media too. Because 9 times out of 10, what men think is “women objectifying men” are characters like Gaston.
And Gaston is NOT a woman-driven fantasy. Gaston is a male wish fulfillment fantasy. Gaston is not what women want, he is what men want to be. He is hyper-masculinity to an extreme degree, dripping with sexism and testosterone. The fact that men think that Gaston is what women want says an awful lot about those men.
While I don’t want to generalize, female fans tend to prefer a very different kind of male hero. We like the Rogers, the Milos, the Hercules. Genuinely kind, often awkward men who are sometimes vulnerable and respectful to women.
Yes, this is a generalization. I own up to that. But I think it’s important to remember that there is often VERY big difference between what MEN want to be and what women WANT in our media.
Reblogging this again because fucking this. And hell, even the muscley dudes (see: Khal Drogo, Hercules, Thor, Captain America) are loved, not because they are muscley, but because they are sweet and loving and adorable. We love Thor because his mispronounces “Hubble” as “Hooble,” not because of what he can do with a hammer.
(via shitmrassay)
……this…looks…actually…inclusive. *slow clap* Tyler Feder, thank you.
<3 <3
Hey there, kickass intersectional feminists! This art is now available as a signed print here at my Etsy shop. Please spread the word!
(via haleyth)
Domestic Abuse now includes : making or attempting to make an individual financially dependent by maintaining total control over financial resources, withholding one’s access to money, or forbidding one’s attendance at school or employment.
One of the problems with VAWA is that its definition of DV is so broad an vague and inclusive of nonviolent acts, (such as name calling) we don’t know how the courts will interpret this language.
WHAT THE FUCK?!
-Liv
but that picture has nothing to do with “making or attempting to make an individual financially dependent by maintaining total control over financial resources, withholding one’s access to money, or forbidding one’s attendance at school or employment.” though. The definition provided above actually is kinda important, because it is very common that the abuser tries to isolate the victim, and cut her resources so that it will be more difficult to escape.
I do not know enough about the VAWA though, I just think that picture is hella dumb and not related with what they’re trying to do.
^THIS
There is a HUGE difference between “hubby won’t pay for a new dress” and what the law is actually talking about. And while I wouldn’t necessarily call what the law is actually talking about “violence”, I think it could easily fall under abuse. It’s talking about a situation where the wife, who most likely does not have a job of her own, is not given any access whatsoever to money. Anything the wants to do, she must ask her husband for. Any money she is given is very likely to just be cash and to be carefully budgeted in a way so that she can only buy what he tells her to buy and nothing else.
What it’s referring to is another way to be hugely controlling, and if a woman is completely dependent financially on her husband, then she cannot leave him. I know some things associated with the current feminist movement can come across as silly, but we’re not doing ourselves any favors by making fun of legitimate concerns.
Somehow I doubt the OP is a feminist making legitimate criticisms.
But here’s something cool for ya: the reason judges exist (as opposed to, say, an automated machine that determines if the situation falls under this or that) is so that they can interpret the language as they see fit. And no judge will ever think not buying a dress counts as abuse, because most judges have common sense. So the OP is not only wrong, they are profoundly and utterly wrong.
(via piscine-unrelated)
Listen, if you keep having to argue with your boyfriend about things like feminism and you (rightfully) hate doing it, just dump him. You might think you’re too ~in love~ to break up over something “trivial” but if you’re arguing these things he is incapable of loving you the way you love him anyway.
Love requires respect, and if you frequently have to yell at your boyfriend to stop being a misogynist asshole it is because he does not respect you and is incapable of respecting you. At best, he tolerates you and finds you physically attractive, and you deserve better than that no matter what you’ve been told.
(via femalevillain)
(via thatchickwiththebook)
The Girl Who Pretended To Be A Boy, from The Violet Fairy Book compiled by Andrew Lang, on Project Gutenberg.
Just. You guys. IT’S A CLASSIC FAIRY TALE ABOUT A PRINCESS WHO GETS TURNED INTO A BOY AND IS SUPER FREAKING HAPPY ABOUT IT AND THEN GETS TO MARRY THE PRINCESS SHE RESCUED.
Thank you, Seanan McGuire, for mentioning that a story like this existed. And thank you, whoever that person who sent her an ask saying the story was in one of the Fairy Books, for sending that ask.
I AM SO HAPPY OMG.
There you go, somebody found the Colored Fairy Book this is from!
(via evantessuraea)
Someone left this on the table I went to go eat at so I took it and true
Every time I see this go around, the first two paragraphs are cut. Fixing that.
(via h-f-x-n-s-h-c)
I thought it was time to give some thought to what the Doctor-assistant relationship is, what function the assistant has on the show, how Doctor Who distributes personal qualities by gender, and why I now hate this lovely show that I used to love.Damn, this rings true and it breaks my (1) heart.
“[in Moffat’s Who] the woman is not of interest for her character or her abilities, but for some fundamental mystery in her being. The mystery isn’t even a secret she’s keeping, something over which she has control- it’s something she does not know about, that the Doctor must puzzle out in his own mind. It’s not about her- it’s about what’s wrong with her. When Steven Moffat took over Doctor Who, women became a problem.”
I love this article.
(via theheroheart)
Misha on the misogyny of Supernatural (via strangepicturesofmishacollins)
This will have one kind of self-aware fan rejoicing
And every other SPN fan in the world screaming and shitting themselves in rage xD
You GO, Misha.
(via solitarelee)
Well, this restores some of my goodwill after the disaster that was the queerbaiting thing. Four for you, Misha, you go, Misha!
(via solitarelee)